<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (8) TMI 90 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83408</link>
    <description>The Tribunal, by majority decision, rejected the stay application and directed the applicant to deposit the pre-deposit amount of Rs. 1,26,086.90 within eight weeks. The Tribunal emphasized the need for concrete evidence to substantiate claims of wrong advice and upheld the principle that substantial justice should prevail over procedural delays without sufficient cause.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 12:26:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120553" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (8) TMI 90 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83408</link>
      <description>The Tribunal, by majority decision, rejected the stay application and directed the applicant to deposit the pre-deposit amount of Rs. 1,26,086.90 within eight weeks. The Tribunal emphasized the need for concrete evidence to substantiate claims of wrong advice and upheld the principle that substantial justice should prevail over procedural delays without sufficient cause.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83408</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>