https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83407 The Tribunal granted the appellants' stay application, waiving the pre-deposit amount and staying the recovery during the appeal's pendency. The department failed to justify the extended period show cause notice, and the Tribunal found the appellants had a prima facie good case. Compliance with SSI production and clearance limits was acknowledged, and the issue of not possessing the SSI certificate earlier was deemed arguable for the main appeal hearing. The judgment emphasizes compliance with notification requirements and the necessity of a valid basis for extending periods in excise duty cases. en-us Wed, 03 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Jul 2011 12:25:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83407 The Tribunal granted the appellants' stay application, waiving the pre-deposit amount and staying the recovery during the appeal's pendency. The department failed to justify the extended period show cause notice, and the Tribunal found the appellants had a prima facie good case. Compliance with SSI production and clearance limits was acknowledged, and the issue of not possessing the SSI certificate earlier was deemed arguable for the main appeal hearing. The judgment emphasizes compliance with notification requirements and the necessity of a valid basis for extending periods in excise duty cases. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 03 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83407