<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (7) TMI 169 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83394</link>
    <description>Pre-deposit of disputed excise duty may be waived where the demand is prima facie covered by earlier Tribunal decisions and insistence on payment would cause undue hardship. In the context of Notification No. 178/88-C.E., the Tribunal treated the prior rulings as sufficient at the stay stage, dispensed with pre-deposit, and directed that recovery should remain in abeyance pending the appeal. The result was relief from deposit during the pendency of the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 12:01:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120539" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (7) TMI 169 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83394</link>
      <description>Pre-deposit of disputed excise duty may be waived where the demand is prima facie covered by earlier Tribunal decisions and insistence on payment would cause undue hardship. In the context of Notification No. 178/88-C.E., the Tribunal treated the prior rulings as sufficient at the stay stage, dispensed with pre-deposit, and directed that recovery should remain in abeyance pending the appeal. The result was relief from deposit during the pendency of the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83394</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>