<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (7) TMI 163 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83388</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, citing inadequate explanation and lack of sufficient cause. The appeal was dismissed as time-barred due to the delay caused by initially filing before the wrong forum and subsequent delays, including those attributed to disturbances in the Kashmir Valley. The Tribunal emphasized the statutory nature of the right of appeal and the need for diligence in pursuing remedies within prescribed timelines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:47:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120533" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (7) TMI 163 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83388</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, citing inadequate explanation and lack of sufficient cause. The appeal was dismissed as time-barred due to the delay caused by initially filing before the wrong forum and subsequent delays, including those attributed to disturbances in the Kashmir Valley. The Tribunal emphasized the statutory nature of the right of appeal and the need for diligence in pursuing remedies within prescribed timelines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>