<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (7) TMI 158 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83383</link>
    <description>Tyres meant for fitment to a combine harvester were classified under the residuary tariff item for all other tyres, not under the item for off-the-road tyres. The classification turned on the intended scope of &quot;off-the-road&quot; tyres in the Central Excise Tariff, which the contemporaneous budget circular and notification showed was directed to motor vehicles such as dumpers and earth-moving equipment. Because a combine harvester operates in fields and does not answer that description, the tyres were held to fall outside the specific entry and within the residuary category. The departmental challenge to the assessee&#039;s classification therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:14:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (7) TMI 158 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83383</link>
      <description>Tyres meant for fitment to a combine harvester were classified under the residuary tariff item for all other tyres, not under the item for off-the-road tyres. The classification turned on the intended scope of &quot;off-the-road&quot; tyres in the Central Excise Tariff, which the contemporaneous budget circular and notification showed was directed to motor vehicles such as dumpers and earth-moving equipment. Because a combine harvester operates in fields and does not answer that description, the tyres were held to fall outside the specific entry and within the residuary category. The departmental challenge to the assessee&#039;s classification therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83383</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>