https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83380 The Tribunal dismissed the application under Section 35G CESA, 1944 due to deficiencies in the original application, lack of required documents, and non-compliance with procedural rules. Despite a request for leniency resulting in reduced fines and penalties, the applicants failed to rectify the deficiencies, respond to notices for compliance, or appear at the scheduled hearing. Following precedents and exercising discretion, the Tribunal declined to forward the statements of the case without annexures, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the application as per guidance from Rajasthan and Bombay High Courts. en-us Tue, 12 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:07:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83380 The Tribunal dismissed the application under Section 35G CESA, 1944 due to deficiencies in the original application, lack of required documents, and non-compliance with procedural rules. Despite a request for leniency resulting in reduced fines and penalties, the applicants failed to rectify the deficiencies, respond to notices for compliance, or appear at the scheduled hearing. Following precedents and exercising discretion, the Tribunal declined to forward the statements of the case without annexures, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the application as per guidance from Rajasthan and Bombay High Courts. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 12 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83380