<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (7) TMI 137 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83362</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand, directing the Collector (Appeals) to hear the stay application and dispose of it on merits in accordance with the law. The appellant was granted six weeks to file the stay application if desired, emphasizing the importance of providing notice and opportunity to rectify non-compliance before dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 18:43:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (7) TMI 137 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83362</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand, directing the Collector (Appeals) to hear the stay application and dispose of it on merits in accordance with the law. The appellant was granted six weeks to file the stay application if desired, emphasizing the importance of providing notice and opportunity to rectify non-compliance before dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83362</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>