<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (6) TMI 91 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83351</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that Sulphuric Acid is an excisable good liable to duty as it is marketable due to its use in the manufacture of Oleum. The appellants were denied the benefit of exemption under Notification No. 217/86-C.E. because Oleum was cleared without payment of duty to specific units, rendering them ineligible for the exemption. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed for lacking merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 18:15:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120496" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (6) TMI 91 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83351</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that Sulphuric Acid is an excisable good liable to duty as it is marketable due to its use in the manufacture of Oleum. The appellants were denied the benefit of exemption under Notification No. 217/86-C.E. because Oleum was cleared without payment of duty to specific units, rendering them ineligible for the exemption. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed for lacking merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>