<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (6) TMI 83 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83343</link>
    <description>Exemption from central excise duty did not automatically extend to cess, so a specific cess notification was required for relief; cess was therefore payable on stitching twine, sacking packsheet and hessian packsheet used in packing exported jute goods. For classification, sacking cloth and sacking bags were treated as &quot;sacking,&quot; and hessian cloth, sheets and bags were treated as &quot;hessian,&quot; while stitching twines were regarded as a separate article requiring classification under the appropriate specific heading rather than a residuary entry. The classification guidance was accepted in part, but the liability issue remained against the assessee and the unresolved portion was remanded for fresh determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 17:44:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (6) TMI 83 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83343</link>
      <description>Exemption from central excise duty did not automatically extend to cess, so a specific cess notification was required for relief; cess was therefore payable on stitching twine, sacking packsheet and hessian packsheet used in packing exported jute goods. For classification, sacking cloth and sacking bags were treated as &quot;sacking,&quot; and hessian cloth, sheets and bags were treated as &quot;hessian,&quot; while stitching twines were regarded as a separate article requiring classification under the appropriate specific heading rather than a residuary entry. The classification guidance was accepted in part, but the liability issue remained against the assessee and the unresolved portion was remanded for fresh determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83343</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>