<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (5) TMI 98 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83308</link>
    <description>An assessee&#039;s entitlement under an earlier appellate order was implemented through correction of an accounting mistake, with the Tribunal treating the transfer from the personal ledger account to the RG-23 account as a permissible regularisation rather than an impermissible relaxation of excise law. Although a direct statutory transfer in the manner later proposed was not allowed under Rule 57H(3), the adjustment was viewed as giving effect to the earlier order and restoring the benefit that should have operated when the notification was in force. The Tribunal applied substance over form and held that the reference raised no referable question of law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 16:15:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120453" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (5) TMI 98 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83308</link>
      <description>An assessee&#039;s entitlement under an earlier appellate order was implemented through correction of an accounting mistake, with the Tribunal treating the transfer from the personal ledger account to the RG-23 account as a permissible regularisation rather than an impermissible relaxation of excise law. Although a direct statutory transfer in the manner later proposed was not allowed under Rule 57H(3), the adjustment was viewed as giving effect to the earlier order and restoring the benefit that should have operated when the notification was in force. The Tribunal applied substance over form and held that the reference raised no referable question of law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83308</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>