https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83294 The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, an exporter of ready-made garments, in a case challenging the withdrawal of Cash Compensatory Support by the Government of India. The Court invoked the doctrine of promissory estoppel, holding that the support could not be retrospectively withdrawn for contracts entered into before the discontinuation date. Citing decisions from other High Courts, the Court emphasized exporters' entitlement to benefits under the scheme if contracts were concluded before the discontinuation. The circular discontinuing the support was deemed illegal, quashed, and the respondents were directed to assess contracts entered into before the discontinuation date, granting cash assistance within six months. en-us Fri, 30 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:39:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83294 The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, an exporter of ready-made garments, in a case challenging the withdrawal of Cash Compensatory Support by the Government of India. The Court invoked the doctrine of promissory estoppel, holding that the support could not be retrospectively withdrawn for contracts entered into before the discontinuation date. Citing decisions from other High Courts, the Court emphasized exporters' entitlement to benefits under the scheme if contracts were concluded before the discontinuation. The circular discontinuing the support was deemed illegal, quashed, and the respondents were directed to assess contracts entered into before the discontinuation date, granting cash assistance within six months. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 30 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83294