https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83292 The Tribunal accepted the main appeals, emphasizing not denying benefits for minor procedural issues. It noted the agreement between IPCL and the appellants, highlighting clauses related to non-tempering of goods and the continuation of title vesting in IPCL until sold. The Tribunal found no evidence of violation of conditions or tampering of goods, and since the appellants rectified the defects by obtaining necessary endorsements on the gate passes, the pre-deposit of amounts in question was waived. en-us Wed, 23 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:35:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83292 The Tribunal accepted the main appeals, emphasizing not denying benefits for minor procedural issues. It noted the agreement between IPCL and the appellants, highlighting clauses related to non-tempering of goods and the continuation of title vesting in IPCL until sold. The Tribunal found no evidence of violation of conditions or tampering of goods, and since the appellants rectified the defects by obtaining necessary endorsements on the gate passes, the pre-deposit of amounts in question was waived. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 23 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83292