https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83272 The Tribunal upheld the Collector's order, rejecting the appeal due to established mis-declaration of goods, violation of Customs Act and ITC, and the appellant's liability for penalties under Section 112. The decision was based on the presence of synthetic waste in the consignment, jurisdiction of the Collector of Customs, Bombay, and the correctness of valuation. The Tribunal found no grounds to overturn the Collector's decision, affirming the confiscation of goods and imposition of penalties on the appellant. en-us Wed, 01 Jun 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Jul 2011 12:44:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83272 The Tribunal upheld the Collector's order, rejecting the appeal due to established mis-declaration of goods, violation of Customs Act and ITC, and the appellant's liability for penalties under Section 112. The decision was based on the presence of synthetic waste in the consignment, jurisdiction of the Collector of Customs, Bombay, and the correctness of valuation. The Tribunal found no grounds to overturn the Collector's decision, affirming the confiscation of goods and imposition of penalties on the appellant. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 01 Jun 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83272