<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (5) TMI 86 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83266</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order with modifications, reducing the redemption fine while sustaining the penalty for non-compliance with recording requirements. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, providing consequential relief to the appellant in line with the law. The judgment emphasized the importance of adherence to statutory recording requirements in Central Excise law to avoid penalties and ensure compliance with regulations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 12:34:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120411" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (5) TMI 86 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83266</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order with modifications, reducing the redemption fine while sustaining the penalty for non-compliance with recording requirements. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, providing consequential relief to the appellant in line with the law. The judgment emphasized the importance of adherence to statutory recording requirements in Central Excise law to avoid penalties and ensure compliance with regulations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83266</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>