<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (5) TMI 75 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83255</link>
    <description>Modvat credit and small-scale industry exemption were treated as non-mutually exclusive where they related to different products classifiable under separate tariff headings; the manufacturer could therefore claim credit on Crown Corks while availing SSI exemption on PP Caps and Metal Containers. Where common inputs such as imported tin plates were used for more than one product, credit was admissible only to the extent supported by separately maintained and verifiable accounts showing actual use for the eligible product. On that basis, the departmental appeal succeeded and the earlier order was set aside, with entitlement confined to the verified credit position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 11:33:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (5) TMI 75 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83255</link>
      <description>Modvat credit and small-scale industry exemption were treated as non-mutually exclusive where they related to different products classifiable under separate tariff headings; the manufacturer could therefore claim credit on Crown Corks while availing SSI exemption on PP Caps and Metal Containers. Where common inputs such as imported tin plates were used for more than one product, credit was admissible only to the extent supported by separately maintained and verifiable accounts showing actual use for the eligible product. On that basis, the departmental appeal succeeded and the earlier order was set aside, with entitlement confined to the verified credit position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>