<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (4) TMI 165 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83242</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, limiting the enforceable demand to six months from the show cause notice date. The decision emphasized the necessity of clear communication from excise authorities regarding changes in excisability criteria and meeting specific criteria for invoking the extended period under Section 11A.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 10:44:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120387" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (4) TMI 165 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83242</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, limiting the enforceable demand to six months from the show cause notice date. The decision emphasized the necessity of clear communication from excise authorities regarding changes in excisability criteria and meeting specific criteria for invoking the extended period under Section 11A.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>