<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (4) TMI 159 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83236</link>
    <description>Removal of intermediate forgings to another factory under the Modvat scheme, followed by delayed payment of duty and no availing of Modvat credit, was treated as causing no loss of revenue. The conduct was found bona fide rather than mala fide, and the alleged non-observance of excise formalities and contravention of the notification did not justify penal action. On these facts, the penalty was held unsustainable and set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 10:28:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (4) TMI 159 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83236</link>
      <description>Removal of intermediate forgings to another factory under the Modvat scheme, followed by delayed payment of duty and no availing of Modvat credit, was treated as causing no loss of revenue. The conduct was found bona fide rather than mala fide, and the alleged non-observance of excise formalities and contravention of the notification did not justify penal action. On these facts, the penalty was held unsustainable and set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83236</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>