https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83215 Repeated failure to cure appeal defects, including defects in the revised EA-3 form, absence of the certified copy of the order-in-original, and omission to affix the company seal, was treated as non-prosecution. Continued defaults in appearance and compliance showed disinterest in pursuing the matter, and the Tribunal invoked the procedural consequence under Rule 11 of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules. The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution and for non-compliance with the Bench's directions. en-us Mon, 28 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Jul 2011 18:25:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83215 Repeated failure to cure appeal defects, including defects in the revised EA-3 form, absence of the certified copy of the order-in-original, and omission to affix the company seal, was treated as non-prosecution. Continued defaults in appearance and compliance showed disinterest in pursuing the matter, and the Tribunal invoked the procedural consequence under Rule 11 of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules. The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution and for non-compliance with the Bench's directions. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 28 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83215