<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (3) TMI 218 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83207</link>
    <description>Prior permission under Rule 57F(2) for direct supply of inputs to a job-worker, coupled with full disclosure of the arrangement and waste treatment, supports retention of Modvat credit. Direct removal to the job-worker&#039;s premises is permissible where the authority approves the arrangement and applicable conditions are met; it does not by itself require credit reversal. A revised declaration identifying Hydrated Lime as an input remains effective despite later departmental acknowledgement. Where material facts, including job work and waste handling, are disclosed, suppression is absent and the extended limitation period cannot support a duty demand or penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:54:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120352" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (3) TMI 218 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83207</link>
      <description>Prior permission under Rule 57F(2) for direct supply of inputs to a job-worker, coupled with full disclosure of the arrangement and waste treatment, supports retention of Modvat credit. Direct removal to the job-worker&#039;s premises is permissible where the authority approves the arrangement and applicable conditions are met; it does not by itself require credit reversal. A revised declaration identifying Hydrated Lime as an input remains effective despite later departmental acknowledgement. Where material facts, including job work and waste handling, are disclosed, suppression is absent and the extended limitation period cannot support a duty demand or penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83207</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>