<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (2) TMI 172 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83198</link>
    <description>Modvat credit cannot be denied solely because the recipient is described as a job worker if the inputs are received under duty-paid gate passes and the scheme conditions are otherwise satisfied. Duty payment was not in dispute, and there was no objection to receipt, coverage, or utilisation of the inputs and resultant outputs under the Modvat framework. The decisive factor was compliance with the prescribed Modvat requirements, which was found to exist, making the job-worker description legally irrelevant for denial of credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:24:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (2) TMI 172 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83198</link>
      <description>Modvat credit cannot be denied solely because the recipient is described as a job worker if the inputs are received under duty-paid gate passes and the scheme conditions are otherwise satisfied. Duty payment was not in dispute, and there was no objection to receipt, coverage, or utilisation of the inputs and resultant outputs under the Modvat framework. The decisive factor was compliance with the prescribed Modvat requirements, which was found to exist, making the job-worker description legally irrelevant for denial of credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83198</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>