<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (10) TMI 188 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83182</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Collector for de novo adjudication on the major duty demand, directing consideration of the appellants&#039; explanations and reconciliation of discrepancies. Confiscation and redemption fines for seized fabrics and the tempo were upheld, while the penalty imposed on the appellants was set aside for redetermination by the Collector. Adjudication completion within six months was ordered, with appellants&#039; cooperation required.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 15:42:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120327" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (10) TMI 188 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83182</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Collector for de novo adjudication on the major duty demand, directing consideration of the appellants&#039; explanations and reconciliation of discrepancies. Confiscation and redemption fines for seized fabrics and the tempo were upheld, while the penalty imposed on the appellants was set aside for redetermination by the Collector. Adjudication completion within six months was ordered, with appellants&#039; cooperation required.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83182</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>