<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (8) TMI 196 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83176</link>
    <description>Mixing acid violet dye with Ranipal and ultramarine blue, followed by heating, filtering and bottling, was held not to amount to manufacture because the process produced only a physical mixture and no new commercially distinct excisable product. On classification, the preparation was treated as an acid violet dye preparation under sub-heading 3204.29, not the residuary sub-heading 3204.90. The revised show cause notice dated 31-5-1991 was treated as a fresh notice because it changed the proposed classification, and the resulting demand was held time-barred beyond the statutory limitation period. The assessee succeeded on manufacture, classification and limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 15:17:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120321" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (8) TMI 196 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83176</link>
      <description>Mixing acid violet dye with Ranipal and ultramarine blue, followed by heating, filtering and bottling, was held not to amount to manufacture because the process produced only a physical mixture and no new commercially distinct excisable product. On classification, the preparation was treated as an acid violet dye preparation under sub-heading 3204.29, not the residuary sub-heading 3204.90. The revised show cause notice dated 31-5-1991 was treated as a fresh notice because it changed the proposed classification, and the resulting demand was held time-barred beyond the statutory limitation period. The assessee succeeded on manufacture, classification and limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>