<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (3) TMI 217 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83146</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay held that ownership of gold and silver is not a requirement under the Gold Import Scheme. The petitioner is granted discharge as the prosecution is no longer viable. The bail bond is to be revoked, and the seized gold and silver will be returned to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 12:46:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120291" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (3) TMI 217 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83146</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay held that ownership of gold and silver is not a requirement under the Gold Import Scheme. The petitioner is granted discharge as the prosecution is no longer viable. The bail bond is to be revoked, and the seized gold and silver will be returned to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83146</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>