<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (3) TMI 216 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83129</link>
    <description>Excisable goods brought into a Free Trade Zone for use in setting up a factory shed were treated as eligible for exemption where they were used in connection with the production of export goods. Notification No. 272/79-C.E. originally covered goods used by industries in the zone for producing goods intended solely for export, and Notification No. 12/81-C.E. widened that wording to include goods used &quot;in connection with the production of goods.&quot; On that reading, asbestos sheets used for construction of the shed fell within the exemption, and the later Notification No. 11/85-C.E. was viewed as confirming the same position. The denial of exemption was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 11:52:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (3) TMI 216 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83129</link>
      <description>Excisable goods brought into a Free Trade Zone for use in setting up a factory shed were treated as eligible for exemption where they were used in connection with the production of export goods. Notification No. 272/79-C.E. originally covered goods used by industries in the zone for producing goods intended solely for export, and Notification No. 12/81-C.E. widened that wording to include goods used &quot;in connection with the production of goods.&quot; On that reading, asbestos sheets used for construction of the shed fell within the exemption, and the later Notification No. 11/85-C.E. was viewed as confirming the same position. The denial of exemption was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>