<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (3) TMI 210 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83123</link>
    <description>Signal conditioning amplifiers used solely and principally with oscilloscopes were classified under Chapter sub-heading 90.30, because classification had to follow the relevant section and chapter notes rather than broad technical descriptions. Note 2(a) of Section XVIII was treated as inapplicable, and Note 2(b) supported classification with the principal measuring apparatus where the goods had no independent function. Expert material showed the products were not audio frequency electric amplifiers under Heading 85.18 but were meant for signal conditioning in instrumentation and measurement. The department&#039;s contrary classification was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 11:24:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120268" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (3) TMI 210 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83123</link>
      <description>Signal conditioning amplifiers used solely and principally with oscilloscopes were classified under Chapter sub-heading 90.30, because classification had to follow the relevant section and chapter notes rather than broad technical descriptions. Note 2(a) of Section XVIII was treated as inapplicable, and Note 2(b) supported classification with the principal measuring apparatus where the goods had no independent function. Expert material showed the products were not audio frequency electric amplifiers under Heading 85.18 but were meant for signal conditioning in instrumentation and measurement. The department&#039;s contrary classification was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83123</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>