<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (3) TMI 206 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83119</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellants&#039; application for early hearing of appeals concerning the clearance of diplomatic cargo due to prolonged detention of goods. The Tribunal deemed the appellants as &quot;persons aggrieved&quot; under Section 129A of the Customs Act, 1962, recognizing their ownership rights over the goods supplied to diplomats until payment is received. The decision rested on the principle that exporters retain ownership until payment, allowing them to request re-export unless involved in fraud or guaranteed payment. The Tribunal&#039;s judgment emphasized the appellants&#039; entitlement to file appeals and seek redress based on ownership rights and procedural fairness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 11:11:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120264" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (3) TMI 206 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83119</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellants&#039; application for early hearing of appeals concerning the clearance of diplomatic cargo due to prolonged detention of goods. The Tribunal deemed the appellants as &quot;persons aggrieved&quot; under Section 129A of the Customs Act, 1962, recognizing their ownership rights over the goods supplied to diplomats until payment is received. The decision rested on the principle that exporters retain ownership until payment, allowing them to request re-export unless involved in fraud or guaranteed payment. The Tribunal&#039;s judgment emphasized the appellants&#039; entitlement to file appeals and seek redress based on ownership rights and procedural fairness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>