<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (3) TMI 204 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83117</link>
    <description>Articles of plastic falling under Tariff Item 68 remained eligible for exemption under Notification No. 182/82-C.E. because the notification did not require manufacture wholly or exclusively from the specified materials under Tariff Item 15A(1). The Tribunal applied the principle that exemption cannot be denied merely because the goods contain some additional materials, unless the notification expressly imposes an exclusivity condition. As the articles were made predominantly from the specified plastic materials and only partly from other inputs, the exemption was available and the departmental denial was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 11:04:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (3) TMI 204 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83117</link>
      <description>Articles of plastic falling under Tariff Item 68 remained eligible for exemption under Notification No. 182/82-C.E. because the notification did not require manufacture wholly or exclusively from the specified materials under Tariff Item 15A(1). The Tribunal applied the principle that exemption cannot be denied merely because the goods contain some additional materials, unless the notification expressly imposes an exclusivity condition. As the articles were made predominantly from the specified plastic materials and only partly from other inputs, the exemption was available and the departmental denial was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>