<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (3) TMI 190 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83103</link>
    <description>Excise duty is attracted on manufacture, but under the notification the decisive conditions were that the goods be manufactured in the factory and intended for use there. Moulds made in the assessee&#039;s factory, retained in that factory and used there remained eligible for exemption, even though sale invoices were raised in favour of a finance company for funding purposes. Mere invoicing without actual removal did not alter the excisable character of the goods or defeat the exemption. As the duty demand rested only on the financing arrangement and not on any breach of the notification condition, the demand and the related penalty were unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 10:22:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120248" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (3) TMI 190 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83103</link>
      <description>Excise duty is attracted on manufacture, but under the notification the decisive conditions were that the goods be manufactured in the factory and intended for use there. Moulds made in the assessee&#039;s factory, retained in that factory and used there remained eligible for exemption, even though sale invoices were raised in favour of a finance company for funding purposes. Mere invoicing without actual removal did not alter the excisable character of the goods or defeat the exemption. As the duty demand rested only on the financing arrangement and not on any breach of the notification condition, the demand and the related penalty were unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>