<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (3) TMI 177 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83090</link>
    <description>Import of firearms during the operative ban was treated as prohibited, so the confiscation and import restriction were sustained. The Tribunal nevertheless followed its earlier line of decisions permitting redemption of confiscated firearms, and allowed release of the revolver on payment of a redemption fine fixed at 400% of CIF value, together with duty at the applicable rate, subject to production of a valid firearms licence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:35:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120235" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (3) TMI 177 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83090</link>
      <description>Import of firearms during the operative ban was treated as prohibited, so the confiscation and import restriction were sustained. The Tribunal nevertheless followed its earlier line of decisions permitting redemption of confiscated firearms, and allowed release of the revolver on payment of a redemption fine fixed at 400% of CIF value, together with duty at the applicable rate, subject to production of a valid firearms licence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>