https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83084 The Tribunal upheld its original order for the cross-examination of 864 witnesses, emphasizing the importance of considering all relevant factors before passing a decision. The rectification of mistake application was dismissed due to the lack of merit in altering the number of witnesses and the legal principles governing such applications. The Tribunal concluded that it lacked the power to review its order on the number of witnesses to be examined, based on the principles laid down by the Hon'ble Calcutta High Court and the Supreme Court. en-us Mon, 28 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 Jul 2011 13:34:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83084 The Tribunal upheld its original order for the cross-examination of 864 witnesses, emphasizing the importance of considering all relevant factors before passing a decision. The rectification of mistake application was dismissed due to the lack of merit in altering the number of witnesses and the legal principles governing such applications. The Tribunal concluded that it lacked the power to review its order on the number of witnesses to be examined, based on the principles laid down by the Hon'ble Calcutta High Court and the Supreme Court. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 28 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83084