https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83051 The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's intervention in seizure and confiscation proceedings, directing the completion of statutory adjudication within 45 days. It emphasized that the right to export goods during adjudication is subject to the process outcome, rejecting expedited measures. The Court instructed prompt completion of adjudication, allowing respondents to redeem goods by paying fines and pursue statutory appeals. The special leave petition was disposed of, affirming these directives for protecting respondents' interests during the legal process. en-us Mon, 24 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Feb 2017 17:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83051 The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's intervention in seizure and confiscation proceedings, directing the completion of statutory adjudication within 45 days. It emphasized that the right to export goods during adjudication is subject to the process outcome, rejecting expedited measures. The Court instructed prompt completion of adjudication, allowing respondents to redeem goods by paying fines and pursue statutory appeals. The special leave petition was disposed of, affirming these directives for protecting respondents' interests during the legal process. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 24 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83051