https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83047 An offence under Section 57 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act was complete where the adjudication order required penalty payment at Madras and the accused failed to comply there. The Madras criminal court therefore had territorial jurisdiction to entertain the complaint, because the breach occurred within its local limits. The availability of an appeal under Section 54 to the High Court where the accused resided or carried on business did not oust that criminal jurisdiction. The quashing petition was rejected and the prosecution was allowed to proceed. en-us Wed, 19 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83047 An offence under Section 57 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act was complete where the adjudication order required penalty payment at Madras and the accused failed to comply there. The Madras criminal court therefore had territorial jurisdiction to entertain the complaint, because the breach occurred within its local limits. The availability of an appeal under Section 54 to the High Court where the accused resided or carried on business did not oust that criminal jurisdiction. The quashing petition was rejected and the prosecution was allowed to proceed. Case-Laws FEMA Wed, 19 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83047