<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (7) TMI 197 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83005</link>
    <description>The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, noting the appellant&#039;s bona fide pursuit of legal remedies. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order due to incorrect observations regarding the counsel&#039;s concession and the questionable conduct of the adjudicating authority. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication by a different authority with directions for expeditious disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 18:18:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120150" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (7) TMI 197 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83005</link>
      <description>The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, noting the appellant&#039;s bona fide pursuit of legal remedies. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order due to incorrect observations regarding the counsel&#039;s concession and the questionable conduct of the adjudicating authority. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication by a different authority with directions for expeditious disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83005</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>