<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (4) TMI 173 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82992</link>
    <description>Imported metal buckles used in the leather industry fall within &quot;metallic embellishments other than zip fasteners&quot; where their appearance and use demonstrate beautification or adornment, notwithstanding an additional functional role. As &quot;metallic embellishment&quot; was undefined, ordinary meaning governs the classification. In the absence of evidence rebutting the buckles&#039; embellishing character, they qualify for the customs exemption. A subsequent amendment expressly referring to buckles removes doubt and is clarificatory rather than altering the existing legal position. Prior consistent administrative treatment further supports this interpretation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 17:43:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (4) TMI 173 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82992</link>
      <description>Imported metal buckles used in the leather industry fall within &quot;metallic embellishments other than zip fasteners&quot; where their appearance and use demonstrate beautification or adornment, notwithstanding an additional functional role. As &quot;metallic embellishment&quot; was undefined, ordinary meaning governs the classification. In the absence of evidence rebutting the buckles&#039; embellishing character, they qualify for the customs exemption. A subsequent amendment expressly referring to buckles removes doubt and is clarificatory rather than altering the existing legal position. Prior consistent administrative treatment further supports this interpretation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>