<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (3) TMI 238 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82987</link>
    <description>Common partners, a shared work force and related business arrangements are not enough, by themselves, to club two excise units; clubbing requires evidence that the concerns function as one financial entity or that one is a dummy of the other, and on the material considered the units were treated as independent. Manufacture of electric motors was found to have taken place at the other unit&#039;s premises, where the necessary machinery was installed and even the respondent&#039;s machinery was kept on rent, so duty was attributable to that premises. The matter was therefore remitted for fresh quantification after hearing the unit concerned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 17:30:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (3) TMI 238 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82987</link>
      <description>Common partners, a shared work force and related business arrangements are not enough, by themselves, to club two excise units; clubbing requires evidence that the concerns function as one financial entity or that one is a dummy of the other, and on the material considered the units were treated as independent. Manufacture of electric motors was found to have taken place at the other unit&#039;s premises, where the necessary machinery was installed and even the respondent&#039;s machinery was kept on rent, so duty was attributable to that premises. The matter was therefore remitted for fresh quantification after hearing the unit concerned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82987</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>