<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (2) TMI 208 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82978</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that splitting a factory into sub-units during a financial year to evade clearance limits under Notification 175/86 is against the legislative purpose. The production from the entire factory should be considered for exemption eligibility, and the split units should be viewed as a continuation of the original factory. Consequently, the respondent was deemed ineligible for the exemption as the aggregate clearances exceeded specified limits. The Tribunal set aside the Collector (Appeals) order, emphasizing the importance of preventing circumvention of clearance limits by interpreting the notification to avoid evasion tactics.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 17:13:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120123" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (2) TMI 208 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82978</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that splitting a factory into sub-units during a financial year to evade clearance limits under Notification 175/86 is against the legislative purpose. The production from the entire factory should be considered for exemption eligibility, and the split units should be viewed as a continuation of the original factory. Consequently, the respondent was deemed ineligible for the exemption as the aggregate clearances exceeded specified limits. The Tribunal set aside the Collector (Appeals) order, emphasizing the importance of preventing circumvention of clearance limits by interpreting the notification to avoid evasion tactics.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>