https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82959 The Tribunal upheld the duty demand on excess goods and confirmed the charge of clandestine removal of glass and glassware against the appellants. The explanations provided by the appellants regarding irregularities in stock and accounts were deemed implausible, leading to the imposition of penalties and confiscation of goods. The Tribunal restricted the demand period to six months prior to the show cause notice date, emphasizing the need for duty payment at the time of removal after proper record entry. The appeal was disposed of in accordance with these findings. en-us Fri, 03 Dec 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Jul 2011 14:59:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82959 The Tribunal upheld the duty demand on excess goods and confirmed the charge of clandestine removal of glass and glassware against the appellants. The explanations provided by the appellants regarding irregularities in stock and accounts were deemed implausible, leading to the imposition of penalties and confiscation of goods. The Tribunal restricted the demand period to six months prior to the show cause notice date, emphasizing the need for duty payment at the time of removal after proper record entry. The appeal was disposed of in accordance with these findings. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 03 Dec 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82959