<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (10) TMI 183 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82957</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled that the products, Salicylic Acid Technical Grade and Parahydroxy Benzoic Acid, were not eligible for exemption under Notification No. 234/86 as they lacked the required certificate and did not meet pharmacopoeial standards. Regarding the classification of Salicylic Acid Technical Grade under sub-heading 3003.20 prior to 13-5-1986, the tribunal found the lower authorities&#039; decision lacking proper reasoning and directed a de novo adjudication for a thorough examination. The tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the case for fresh adjudication to consider all relevant aspects and allowing the appellants to present additional evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 13:49:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120102" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (10) TMI 183 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82957</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled that the products, Salicylic Acid Technical Grade and Parahydroxy Benzoic Acid, were not eligible for exemption under Notification No. 234/86 as they lacked the required certificate and did not meet pharmacopoeial standards. Regarding the classification of Salicylic Acid Technical Grade under sub-heading 3003.20 prior to 13-5-1986, the tribunal found the lower authorities&#039; decision lacking proper reasoning and directed a de novo adjudication for a thorough examination. The tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the case for fresh adjudication to consider all relevant aspects and allowing the appellants to present additional evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82957</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>