<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (11) TMI 129 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82954</link>
    <description>Water well drilling rigs mounted on motor vehicle chassis are classifiable as drilling machinery under Tariff Heading 84.30 where the chassis and rig form a functionally integrated unit and the chassis cannot independently serve as a motor vehicle. Extended limitation does not apply where goods were fully described in commercial and statutory records and wilful suppression or misstatement is not established. Clubbing of clearances for small-scale exemption requires proof that units are dummy concerns or manufacture on another&#039;s behalf; common management, inter-unit dealings, or related-person status alone are insufficient. Consequently, exemption and Modvat credit cannot be denied solely through unsupported clubbing. Only specifically substantiated valuation and modification-related duty liabilities may sustain penalties or related consequences.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 13:41:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120099" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (11) TMI 129 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82954</link>
      <description>Water well drilling rigs mounted on motor vehicle chassis are classifiable as drilling machinery under Tariff Heading 84.30 where the chassis and rig form a functionally integrated unit and the chassis cannot independently serve as a motor vehicle. Extended limitation does not apply where goods were fully described in commercial and statutory records and wilful suppression or misstatement is not established. Clubbing of clearances for small-scale exemption requires proof that units are dummy concerns or manufacture on another&#039;s behalf; common management, inter-unit dealings, or related-person status alone are insufficient. Consequently, exemption and Modvat credit cannot be denied solely through unsupported clubbing. Only specifically substantiated valuation and modification-related duty liabilities may sustain penalties or related consequences.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82954</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>