<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (11) TMI 123 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82948</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that solvents used in printing PVC sheets/films qualified as inputs under Notification 201/79. The solvents were deemed essential in the manufacturing process, meeting the criteria of &quot;raw-material&quot; based on legal principles and precedents, including the indispensability of an ingredient in the manufacturing process. The appeal challenging the duty set-off claimed by the manufacturer was rejected, affirming the eligibility of solvents for exemption under the notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 13:19:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (11) TMI 123 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82948</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that solvents used in printing PVC sheets/films qualified as inputs under Notification 201/79. The solvents were deemed essential in the manufacturing process, meeting the criteria of &quot;raw-material&quot; based on legal principles and precedents, including the indispensability of an ingredient in the manufacturing process. The appeal challenging the duty set-off claimed by the manufacturer was rejected, affirming the eligibility of solvents for exemption under the notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82948</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>