<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (10) TMI 173 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82931</link>
    <description>Credit validly earned under Rule 57K and standing in the assessee&#039;s RG 23 Part-II account was not retrospectively extinguished by rescission of the notification under which it arose. The distinction between earning credit and utilising credit was material, and a rescinding notification did not, without express words or necessary implication, take away an accrued right to use already earned credit. The credit therefore remained available for utilisation after rescission, and denial of such use was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 12:33:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (10) TMI 173 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82931</link>
      <description>Credit validly earned under Rule 57K and standing in the assessee&#039;s RG 23 Part-II account was not retrospectively extinguished by rescission of the notification under which it arose. The distinction between earning credit and utilising credit was material, and a rescinding notification did not, without express words or necessary implication, take away an accrued right to use already earned credit. The credit therefore remained available for utilisation after rescission, and denial of such use was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82931</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>