<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (9) TMI 227 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82929</link>
    <description>Exemption notification benefits are governed by the law in force on the date of each clearance, because each clearance is a separate legal event. An amendment enhancing the eligibility limit will operate prospectively unless the notification clearly states otherwise; here, no retrospective intent was expressed. The claimed application of the amended limit to prior clearances was therefore rejected, and refund entitlement was denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 12:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (9) TMI 227 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82929</link>
      <description>Exemption notification benefits are governed by the law in force on the date of each clearance, because each clearance is a separate legal event. An amendment enhancing the eligibility limit will operate prospectively unless the notification clearly states otherwise; here, no retrospective intent was expressed. The claimed application of the amended limit to prior clearances was therefore rejected, and refund entitlement was denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>