<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (2) TMI 287 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82889</link>
    <description>Off-line English/Devnagari keyboards imported with photo composing machines were treated as integral components of a composite printing unit used in the printing industry. Applying Section Note 3 to Section XVI and Note 5 to Chapter 84, classification followed the machine&#039;s principal function, which was photo composing/type-setting, rather than treating the keyboards as separate data processing equipment. On that basis, the goods were classifiable under Heading 84.34 and satisfied Notification No. 114/80-Cus., which covered photo composing machines with keyboards for use in the printing industry. The Revenue&#039;s contrary classification and exemption challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 18:40:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (2) TMI 287 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82889</link>
      <description>Off-line English/Devnagari keyboards imported with photo composing machines were treated as integral components of a composite printing unit used in the printing industry. Applying Section Note 3 to Section XVI and Note 5 to Chapter 84, classification followed the machine&#039;s principal function, which was photo composing/type-setting, rather than treating the keyboards as separate data processing equipment. On that basis, the goods were classifiable under Heading 84.34 and satisfied Notification No. 114/80-Cus., which covered photo composing machines with keyboards for use in the printing industry. The Revenue&#039;s contrary classification and exemption challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>