https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82884 RT-12 assessments fastening duty liability were treated as appealable orders under the Central Excise framework then in force, and there was no requirement for separate appeals merely because multiple assessments were involved. The first appellate authority should not have dismissed the matter as a nullity without examining the merits, and if any defect in form existed, the appellants could have been asked to cure it. The dismissal was therefore unsustainable, and the matter had to be reheard and decided afresh without insisting on multiple appeals. en-us Fri, 26 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Jul 2011 18:32:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82884 RT-12 assessments fastening duty liability were treated as appealable orders under the Central Excise framework then in force, and there was no requirement for separate appeals merely because multiple assessments were involved. The first appellate authority should not have dismissed the matter as a nullity without examining the merits, and if any defect in form existed, the appellants could have been asked to cure it. The dismissal was therefore unsustainable, and the matter had to be reheard and decided afresh without insisting on multiple appeals. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 26 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82884