<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (10) TMI 179 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82875</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ordered a refund of the redemption fine, set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant, and addressed pleas for demurrage, interest, and freight refund. The appellant&#039;s innocence regarding the forged license was considered, leading to a favorable outcome in terms of the redemption fine and penalty. However, requests for demurrage and freight refund were not granted due to legal limitations and the appellant&#039;s option to challenge the initial order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 18:14:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120020" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (10) TMI 179 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82875</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ordered a refund of the redemption fine, set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant, and addressed pleas for demurrage, interest, and freight refund. The appellant&#039;s innocence regarding the forged license was considered, leading to a favorable outcome in terms of the redemption fine and penalty. However, requests for demurrage and freight refund were not granted due to legal limitations and the appellant&#039;s option to challenge the initial order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82875</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>