https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82848 Where an efficacious statutory appeal is available under the Imports & Exports (Control) Act, 1947, Article 226 writ jurisdiction should ordinarily not be invoked and the party must first exhaust the alternate remedy. The impugned order was held amenable to appeal under Section 4(M)(1)(b), so the petitioners were directed to pursue the appellate remedy before the Additional Chief Controller at New Delhi instead of continuing with the writ petition. The note also records that the appeal would be time-barred on the decision date and that an application for condonation of delay would need to accompany the appeal. en-us Wed, 08 Dec 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Jul 2011 17:01:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82848 Where an efficacious statutory appeal is available under the Imports & Exports (Control) Act, 1947, Article 226 writ jurisdiction should ordinarily not be invoked and the party must first exhaust the alternate remedy. The impugned order was held amenable to appeal under Section 4(M)(1)(b), so the petitioners were directed to pursue the appellate remedy before the Additional Chief Controller at New Delhi instead of continuing with the writ petition. The note also records that the appeal would be time-barred on the decision date and that an application for condonation of delay would need to accompany the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 08 Dec 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82848