<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (11) TMI 115 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82842</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of second-hand machinery, a Linotype Phototype setting system, valued at US $30,500 c.i.f., under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962. The machinery was allowed to be redeemed on payment of a fine of Rs. 2,00,000. The appellants&#039; challenge was dismissed as they failed to establish a firm contract for importation and the machinery did not comply with import policies in force during the relevant period. The appeal was dismissed, and the redemption fine was upheld as not excessive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 16:49:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (11) TMI 115 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82842</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of second-hand machinery, a Linotype Phototype setting system, valued at US $30,500 c.i.f., under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962. The machinery was allowed to be redeemed on payment of a fine of Rs. 2,00,000. The appellants&#039; challenge was dismissed as they failed to establish a firm contract for importation and the machinery did not comply with import policies in force during the relevant period. The appeal was dismissed, and the redemption fine was upheld as not excessive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>