<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (11) TMI 113 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82840</link>
    <description>Notification No. 120/75-C.E. allowed duty exemption on clearances valued by invoice price, provided the price was not influenced by any commercial, financial or other relationship between manufacturer and buyer and no part of resale proceeds accrued to the manufacturer. The notification operated independently of Section 4 valuation and could accept a difference between invoice price and assessable value. On the record, long-standing dealings, packing, quality control, advances and marketing support did not by themselves prove that the invoice price was so influenced or that resale proceeds flowed back to the manufacturer. The exemption was therefore available and denial of it was unwarranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 16:41:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (11) TMI 113 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82840</link>
      <description>Notification No. 120/75-C.E. allowed duty exemption on clearances valued by invoice price, provided the price was not influenced by any commercial, financial or other relationship between manufacturer and buyer and no part of resale proceeds accrued to the manufacturer. The notification operated independently of Section 4 valuation and could accept a difference between invoice price and assessable value. On the record, long-standing dealings, packing, quality control, advances and marketing support did not by themselves prove that the invoice price was so influenced or that resale proceeds flowed back to the manufacturer. The exemption was therefore available and denial of it was unwarranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>