<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (10) TMI 163 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82830</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the cross-objection and allowed the appeal, affirming the classification of the product under a different Tariff Item based on the manufacturing process and composition involving Polypropylene and Fibre Glass. The Tribunal determined that the process resulted in the emergence of Reinforced Plastic, a distinct product with specific properties, supporting the classification under a specific Tariff Item due to the high proportion of Fibre Glass.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 16:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119975" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (10) TMI 163 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82830</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the cross-objection and allowed the appeal, affirming the classification of the product under a different Tariff Item based on the manufacturing process and composition involving Polypropylene and Fibre Glass. The Tribunal determined that the process resulted in the emergence of Reinforced Plastic, a distinct product with specific properties, supporting the classification under a specific Tariff Item due to the high proportion of Fibre Glass.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82830</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>