<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (10) TMI 154 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82821</link>
    <description>Exemption under Notifications Nos. 130/83-C.E. and 131/83-C.E. depended on a letter of intent or industrial licence issued within the prescribed period for a new sugar factory or capacity expansion, supported by certification from the Chief Director, Directorate of Sugar. The record showed earlier expansion permissions, later renewal, a representation treating the project as a new unit, and an amended licence deeming the earlier licence amended for setting up a new unit. The Chief Director&#039;s certificate also supported eligibility. On these facts, the exemption could not be denied merely because the formal amendment was issued later, and the appellants were entitled to the benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 15:27:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119966" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (10) TMI 154 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82821</link>
      <description>Exemption under Notifications Nos. 130/83-C.E. and 131/83-C.E. depended on a letter of intent or industrial licence issued within the prescribed period for a new sugar factory or capacity expansion, supported by certification from the Chief Director, Directorate of Sugar. The record showed earlier expansion permissions, later renewal, a representation treating the project as a new unit, and an amended licence deeming the earlier licence amended for setting up a new unit. The Chief Director&#039;s certificate also supported eligibility. On these facts, the exemption could not be denied merely because the formal amendment was issued later, and the appellants were entitled to the benefit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>